Piddingworth Greg Benton
PIDDINGWORTH
index
DOWNLOAD ADOBE READER
'Piddingworth...where St. George's Cross is not yet banned.'
                                                                            --
Mark Steyn
PIDDINGWORTH
HISTORY
REFERENCE/INDEX
LEGACY
PROFILE
MILITARY
REMEMBRANCE
Thank you very much
     for your support!
HOME
FAITH
PIDDFLICKS
When I was a child,
I spoke like a child, thought like a child,
and reasoned like a
child. When I became a man, I gave up my childish ways.

Saint Paul
1Corinthians 13.11
GOING ALL THE WAY
Not long ago, in my commentary on 'the generation with the new explanation',
I invited readers to compare & contrast the society and culture that the
baby boomers have produced with that of their parents and grandparents.
Of course, the differences are so glaring that those of us whose childhood
was lived in the fifties might just as well be considered 'pre-historic' or at least
'ancient' where our memories of the virtues and decency that were the foundation
of the time are today ridiculed and dismissed out of hand.

This past week in Canada, 'Exhibits 'A' and 'B' have confirmed the utter
moral and civil bankruptcy that prevails in our cultural institutions as well as in
the shameless, all-pervasive support of the aging boomers that feeds it

First, the committee with the Governor-General that oversees the appointment
of people to the 'Order of Canada', an 'honour' that is designed to recognise those,
from many walks of life, who have made signficant contributions to the country,
chose to admit to it's company, one Dr. Henry Morgentaler, the abortionist and
abortion activist.

There are many, of course, like me and certainly the Church and others outside
our national institutions, who have vehemently objected to this man's receiving
the award, not only because he is responsible for snuffing out the lives of those
whose continued existence he has denied, but also because he is such a divisive
national figure.  Dr. Wilder Penfield, the famed brain surgeon, he is not. 
If you are an American reader, think of Jack Kervorkian, the infamous 'Dr. Death'
who built and used his 'suicide apparatus' to help people kill themselves, as receiving
your 'Medal of Freedom'. 

The motto of the Order of Canada is 'they desire a better country'.  Even if one
thought that abortion ought to be legal and rare, and I am not one, Morgentaler
is virtually responsible for the removal of any prohibition against abortion and
leaving Canada the only country in the western world where an unborn child
can be killed at any time up to the moment just before birth.  What the late
great Pope John Paul II called 'the culture of death', is at the centre of this
man's 'life work'. 

Morgentaler, ironically a survivor of the
death camp Auschwitz, is one of those
from my parent's generation, who like those materialists and socialists that promoted
eugenics, i.e., the deliberate culling of human life, does not recognise the
fundamental dignity of all human life.  Under the famed feminista mantra 'pro-choice',
the abortionists actively snuff out the lives that are growing in a mother's womb
without regard to that child's God-given right to live.  Of course, 'child' and 'God'
are not part of their vocab.

To 'raise' this man up as a 'virtuous' example for Canadians is an abomination and
a disgrace; although not quite as abominable or disgraceful as what he does. 
To so many of the boomer generation of feminists, however, Morgentaler is a 'hero'
whose efforts have permitted girls and women to have an abortion under any
circumstance and as frequently as they wish; effectively making the procedure
a means of birth control. 

Right on cue, comes one
Connie Woodcock, a Canadian baby boomer journalist
who applauds Morgentaler and the Order of Canada committee.
Giving voice to those of her generation whose sexual appetites could be 'satisfied'
at will because of 'the pill' and, if that didn't work, or they 'forgot' to take it,
then abortion, Woodcock blindly demonstrates the selfishness and stupidity
that is characteristic of the apparent majority of today's 'modern woman'
and her metrosexual counterparts. 

Speaking from her own experience and when, as she says, she was 'young and stupid',
(she was 20 years old!) she tells of having one of the 'scariest' moments of her life: 
She had sexual intercourse and thought she was pregnant and so was afraid how
that might limit her 'career' and future.  Remarking that the younger generation of
women today similarly remain 'stupid', she believes that if she had been either
'on the pill' or, if pregnant, could have had an abortion, then it wouldn't have been
'scary' and she could pursue her own life's interest. It's having the 'choice' that
counts.  Is it really?

In other words, her sexual choices are not really her responsibility, but that of
the pharmaceutical industry and/or the health care system. The 'choice' that she made,
along with myriad other women of her generation, to engage in an activity that,
with some precedent, tends to lead to the creation of children, is one for which
she is not accountable.  'If it feels good, do it', some girls used to have sewn
on the bums of their blue jeans and so, if I am 'young' and 'stupid' by doing 'it',
I'm off the hook; even if by my choice I have participated in the creation of a
little human being.  This is the 'reasoning' of someone who refuses to grow up.

The real stupidity of Woodcock's rant is not so much her having given in to lust
when she was a university student.  Her folly is that of the prevailing elite whose
idiocy, fed by an atheistic and materialist ideology, is in the absurdity that things
only have 'value' if I, they, we, the committee, the politicians, et al, give it value. 
So, a child that  'I want' and that is growing in me is called a 'baby' and a child that
'I don't want' and that is growing in me is merely a 'foetus'.  As for the poor kid,
he is at the mercy of his mother's 'choice': first, to create him or her and second to
let him or her live or die based on her 'career' and 'future' according to her own
selfish interest.

The expression, 'going all the way' is long out of fashion today.  It used to be a
very big deal.  Those who thought about going beyond necking and petting in
the back seat of a car certainly knew that they were playing with something
more powerful than them.  With the advent of the pill, 'going all the way' was
made easy and sexual experiences became increasingly more frequent, promiscuous,
and common; so much so that 'going all the way' itself has become 'no big deal'.
What was once was so highly revered and protected in society, i.e., human life,
marriage, and the like, have become dispensable.  What once was regarded
as the fulfilment of the bond between a man and woman, has been reduced to
mere hedonism and the 'hooking up' with mulitiple partners.  Where the common law
and common sense that once defended the life of an unborn child to the extent where
an abortionist like Morgentaler was once put in gaol, has now been replaced by the primacy
of self-interest and the delinquency of moral responsibilty; all with the co-operation
of our complicit and cowardly politicians and courts.

We have indeed 'gone all the way'...towards a culture that promotes evils that it calls
'good', and dismisses the sacred (i.e., authority) that it regards as 'bad' and for which
it retains an active contempt..  In spite of the many continuing good voices that attempt
to appeal to a collective conscience that no longer exists, this ever-adolescent Me generation
and their co-horts have achieved in a few decades what took centuries to develop and build: 
a decent society with a moral foundation endowed by powers greater than that of an
aging journalist.

Woodcock tells her readers not to bother sending her any e-mails that express
a view different from hers.  She says, 'Don't care what you think anymore'.

Ah, yes.  One can nearly hear the harsh echo of that same refrain from her and myriad
other 'stupid' and 'young' people to their parents, to their teachers, to the Church and,
indeed, to God; all of whom are expected to be 'tolerant' of her ilk and approve of
their bad behaviour.